Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire OGrady Mikayla's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights OGrady Mikayla's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the OGrady Mikayla's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve OGrady Mikayla's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:11 | 46:58 to 42:47 | 74.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:07 | 06:20 to 05:13 | 19.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 04:31 to 04:13 | 5.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:02 | 04:58 to 04:56 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:34 to 03:34 | 0.0% |
| OGrady Mikayla | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:15 | 00:00 | 04:57 -00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 04:15 | 05:01 -00:18 | 04:57 -00:42 |
| Running 2 | 05:37 | 08:58 | 05:16 +00:21 | 09:58 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:10 | 14:35 | 02:36 -00:26 | 15:14 -00:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:47 | 16:45 | 05:30 +00:17 | 17:50 -01:05 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 22:32 | 05:23 -00:25 | 23:20 -00:48 |
| Running 4 | 05:51 | 27:30 | 05:32 +00:19 | 28:43 -01:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:20 | 33:21 | 05:37 +00:43 | 34:15 -00:54 |
| Running 5 | 06:12 | 39:41 | 05:41 +00:31 | 39:52 -00:11 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 45:53 | 05:16 -00:16 | 45:33 +00:20 |
| Running 6 | 06:02 | 50:53 | 05:35 +00:27 | 50:49 +00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 56:55 | 02:10 -00:10 | 56:24 +00:31 |
| Running 7 | 06:07 | 58:55 | 05:33 +00:34 | 58:34 +00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 01:05:02 | 04:28 +00:03 | 01:04:07 +00:55 |
| Running 8 | 07:11 | 01:09:33 | 05:54 +01:17 | 01:08:35 +00:58 |
| Wall Balls | 03:34 | 01:16:44 | 04:32 -00:58 | 01:14:29 +02:15 |
| Roxzone | 05:12 | 01:25:20 | 06:19 -01:07 | 01:25:20 |
Mikayla OGrady's performance in the 2024 Sydney Hyrox race was commendable, placing her in the top 12% overall and in her age group. Her overall time was 01:25:20, indicating strong competitiveness. While her strength-based exercises were generally above average, her total running time was 00:46:58, which is 02:19 slower than average, suggesting a need for improvement in running. Mikayla demonstrated a strong start in the initial segments but experienced a notable slowdown in the later running laps, pointing to possible pacing issues. Her performance indicates a hybrid athlete profile, excelling in strength but needing improvement in running endurance and pacing.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zizkat Debra | 2023 Köln | 01:25:44 | |
| Toson Clarissa | 2024 Turin | 01:25:17 | |
| Mankowski Lisa | 2024 Berlin | 01:25:45 | |
| Hogendorp Amber | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:25:49 | |
| Hodgkinson Lucy | 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:06 | |
| Düthorn Antje | 2023 München | 01:24:54 | |
| Pavlov Tanja | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:25:01 | |
| Goodwin Alexandra | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:25:13 | |
| Bostock Holly | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:15 | |
| Van Den Bosch Barbara | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:25:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
