Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Selij Edwin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Selij Edwin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Selij Edwin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Selij Edwin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:57 | 54:22 to 49:25 | 92.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 03:45 to 03:33 | 3.7% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 05:18 to 05:11 | 2.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:44 to 02:37 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:51 to 06:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:04 to 06:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:24 to 07:24 | 0.0% |
| Selij Edwin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:55 | 00:00 | 05:14 +00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 05:55 | 04:42 -00:14 | 05:14 +00:41 |
| Running 2 | 05:49 | 10:23 | 05:46 +00:03 | 09:56 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 03:45 | 16:12 | 03:28 +00:17 | 15:42 +00:30 |
| Running 3 | 06:46 | 19:57 | 06:23 +00:23 | 19:10 +00:47 |
| Sled Pull | 05:03 | 26:43 | 06:03 -01:00 | 25:33 +01:10 |
| Running 4 | 06:33 | 31:46 | 06:21 +00:12 | 31:36 +00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:51 | 38:19 | 06:55 -00:04 | 37:57 +00:22 |
| Running 5 | 07:45 | 45:10 | 06:37 +01:08 | 44:52 +00:18 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 52:55 | 05:13 +00:05 | 51:29 +01:26 |
| Running 6 | 06:53 | 58:13 | 06:24 +00:29 | 56:42 +01:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:44 | 01:05:06 | 02:36 +00:08 | 01:03:06 +02:00 |
| Running 7 | 06:55 | 01:07:50 | 06:23 +00:32 | 01:05:42 +02:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:04 | 01:14:45 | 06:28 -00:24 | 01:12:05 +02:40 |
| Running 8 | 07:49 | 01:20:49 | 07:36 +00:13 | 01:18:33 +02:16 |
| Wall Balls | 07:24 | 01:28:38 | 08:26 -01:02 | 01:26:09 +02:29 |
| Roxzone | 07:52 | 01:43:47 | 09:12 -01:20 | 01:43:47 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Edwin struggled in several running segments, including Running 1, Running 3, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8. These segments accounted for the most time lost during the race. Additionally, the Best Lap time was slower than average, indicating that he may have started too fast or struggled with pacing.
In summary, Edwin Selij performed well in the HYROX race in Rotterdam, but there are areas where he can improve. By focusing on his running performance, enhancing his endurance, speed, and pacing strategies, and working on his overall fitness and transition time, he can enhance his performance in future races. Implementing specific training strategies, drills, and exercises tailored to his weaknesses will help him become a stronger and more efficient athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rodriguez Connor | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:43:38 | |
| Sánchez Ismael | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:44:14 | |
| Yuen Hong Yiu | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:43:24 | |
| Weise Kai | 2022 Hamburg | 01:44:10 | |
| Cuenca Fabian | 2023 Barcelona | 01:43:44 | |
| Damnjanovski Zlatko | 2022 München | 01:44:06 | |
| Eka Firmansyah Septian | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:43:24 | |
| Johannsen Jens | 2019 Hamburg | 01:43:26 | |
| Moses Steven | 2022 Birmingham | 01:43:55 | |
| Hill James | 2023 Glasgow | 01:43:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
