Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 968 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcleish Emma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcleish Emma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcleish Emma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcleish Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 03:20 | 09:19 to 05:59 | 38.8% |
| Sled Push | 01:45 | 04:36 to 02:51 | 20.4% |
| Rowing | 00:57 | 06:26 to 05:29 | 11.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:45 | 05:50 to 05:05 | 8.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:44 | 03:02 to 02:18 | 8.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:32 | 05:44 to 05:12 | 6.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:20 | 06:56 to 06:36 | 3.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:12 | 05:25 to 05:13 | 2.3% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:32 to 43:32 | 0.0% |
| Mcleish Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:01 | 00:00 | 05:26 -00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:44 | 05:01 | 05:15 +00:29 | 05:26 -00:25 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 10:45 | 05:48 -00:52 | 10:41 +00:04 |
| Sled Push | 04:36 | 15:41 | 02:58 +01:38 | 16:29 -00:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:21 | 20:17 | 06:07 -00:46 | 19:27 +00:50 |
| Sled Pull | 09:19 | 25:38 | 06:18 +03:01 | 25:34 +00:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 34:57 | 06:10 -00:47 | 31:52 +03:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:56 | 40:20 | 06:54 +00:02 | 38:02 +02:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 47:16 | 06:20 -00:43 | 44:56 +02:20 |
| Rowing | 06:26 | 52:53 | 05:32 +00:54 | 51:16 +01:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 59:19 | 06:13 -00:56 | 56:48 +02:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:02 | 01:04:36 | 02:25 +00:37 | 01:03:01 +01:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 01:07:38 | 06:12 -00:57 | 01:05:26 +02:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:50 | 01:12:53 | 05:18 +00:32 | 01:11:38 +01:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:45 | 01:18:43 | 06:45 +00:00 | 01:16:56 +01:47 |
| Wall Balls | 05:25 | 01:25:28 | 05:34 -00:09 | 01:23:41 +01:47 |
| Roxzone | 06:14 | 01:37:00 | 07:45 -01:31 | 01:37:00 |
Based on the splits analysis, Emma showed strength in several segments, including Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8. In these segments, she consistently performed faster than the average time, demonstrating her proficiency as a runner.
Overall, Emma Mcleish's performance in the HYROX race was commendable, with strengths in running segments and areas for improvement in specific exercises. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, she can enhance her performance in the identified segments and improve her overall race results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Descombaz Amy | 2024 Dallas | 01:37:23 | |
| Thodé Justin | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:37:06 | |
| Ullah Surriaya | 2022 London | 01:36:53 | |
| Gustafsson Hedvig | 2024 Stockholm | 01:36:44 | |
| Mändli Manuela | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:37:15 | |
| Duke Elise | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:37:14 | |
| Eatherington Zoe | 2022 Birmingham | 01:36:32 | |
| Kelly Diane | 2024 Glasgow | 01:36:59 | |
| Humphries Lucy | 2023 London | 01:37:17 | |
| Vanhoren Muriel | 2022 Essen | 01:36:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:36:03 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:28:59 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
