Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 987 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Herm Lisa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Herm Lisa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Herm Lisa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Herm Lisa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:04 | 50:04 to 48:00 | 44.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:07 | 06:10 to 05:03 | 23.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:04 | 07:37 to 06:33 | 22.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:26 | 02:43 to 02:17 | 9.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Herm Lisa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:05 | 00:00 | 05:25 -00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 05:05 | 05:14 -00:23 | 05:25 -00:20 |
| Running 2 | 05:51 | 09:56 | 05:46 +00:05 | 10:39 -00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:05 | 15:47 | 02:56 -00:51 | 16:25 -00:38 |
| Running 3 | 06:10 | 17:52 | 06:05 +00:05 | 19:21 -01:29 |
| Sled Pull | 05:02 | 24:02 | 06:16 -01:14 | 25:26 -01:24 |
| Running 4 | 06:11 | 29:04 | 06:07 +00:04 | 31:42 -02:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:37 | 35:15 | 06:53 +00:44 | 37:49 -02:34 |
| Running 5 | 06:20 | 42:52 | 06:17 +00:03 | 44:42 -01:50 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 49:12 | 05:32 -00:33 | 50:59 -01:47 |
| Running 6 | 06:40 | 54:11 | 06:10 +00:30 | 56:31 -02:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:43 | 01:00:51 | 02:25 +00:18 | 01:02:41 -01:50 |
| Running 7 | 06:17 | 01:03:34 | 06:09 +00:08 | 01:05:06 -01:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:10 | 01:09:51 | 05:15 +00:55 | 01:11:15 -01:24 |
| Running 8 | 07:34 | 01:16:01 | 06:41 +00:53 | 01:16:30 -00:29 |
| Wall Balls | 05:11 | 01:23:35 | 05:32 -00:21 | 01:23:11 +00:24 |
| Roxzone | 07:43 | 01:36:21 | 07:38 +00:05 | 01:36:21 |
Lisa's best running lap was 00:05:05, which was 00:09 faster than the average. Her performance in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments was also notable, as she finished 00:21 and 01:13 faster than the average, respectively. However, there were areas where Lisa lost time, such as in the Burpees Broad Jump, Sandbag Lunges, Running 8, Running 6, and Roxzone segments.
By implementing these training strategies and race strategies, Lisa Herm can improve her performance in the HYROX race, specifically in the identified areas of improvement. It is important for her to tailor her training to address her weaknesses while also maintaining her strengths. Regular practice, consistency, and dedication to her training will contribute to her overall improvement as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nolte Britta | 2023 Hamburg | 01:35:51 | |
| Smith Kaya | 2023 London | 01:36:12 | |
| Wasik Anna | 2024 Poznan | 01:36:12 | |
| Snowdon Sophie | 2024 Malaga | 01:35:56 | |
| Helvacioglu Polly | 2024 Rimini | 01:36:23 | |
| Moore Georgina | 2024 Dublin | 01:36:13 | |
| Fairgrieve Stacey | 2023 Glasgow | 01:36:41 | |
| O'Neil Lucy | 2024 London | 01:36:38 | |
| Buchan Jill | 2023 Birmingham | 01:36:15 | |
| Owens Nicole | 2022 Dallas | 01:36:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Frankfurt | 01:39:47 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
