Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mullen Gerard's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mullen Gerard's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mullen Gerard's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mullen Gerard's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:44 | 05:59 to 04:15 | 33.7% |
| Sled Push | 01:27 | 03:55 to 02:28 | 28.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:19 | 03:13 to 01:54 | 25.6% |
| Run Total | 00:17 | 39:43 to 39:26 | 5.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:15 | 05:45 to 05:30 | 4.9% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:41 to 04:36 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:18 to 04:16 | 0.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:40 to 02:40 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Mullen Gerard | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:25 | 00:00 | 04:24 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 03:25 | 04:22 -00:04 | 04:24 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 04:46 | 07:43 | 04:45 +00:01 | 08:46 -01:03 |
| Sled Push | 03:55 | 12:29 | 02:45 +01:10 | 13:31 -01:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 16:24 | 05:08 -00:07 | 16:16 +00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 05:59 | 21:25 | 04:37 +01:22 | 21:24 +00:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:01 | 27:24 | 05:07 -00:06 | 26:01 +01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:40 | 32:25 | 04:57 -02:17 | 31:08 +01:17 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 35:05 | 05:16 +00:15 | 36:05 -01:00 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 40:36 | 04:42 -00:01 | 41:21 -00:45 |
| Running 6 | 05:13 | 45:17 | 05:09 +00:04 | 46:03 -00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:13 | 50:30 | 02:04 +01:09 | 51:12 -00:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 53:43 | 05:07 -00:03 | 53:16 +00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:12 | 58:47 | 04:46 -00:34 | 58:23 +00:24 |
| Running 8 | 05:45 | 01:02:59 | 05:37 +00:08 | 01:03:09 -00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 05:45 | 01:08:44 | 06:02 -00:17 | 01:08:46 -00:02 |
| Roxzone | 06:42 | 01:21:03 | 06:15 +00:27 | 01:21:03 |
Based on the splits analysis, Gerard performed exceptionally well in the Running 1 and Burpees Broad Jump segments, outperforming the average by 51 seconds and 1 minute 55 seconds, respectively. This indicates his strength in both running and explosive movements. However, he struggled in segments such as Farmers Carry, Sled Pull, Sled Push, Roxzone, Running 5, and Running 2, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
In conclusion, Gerard Mullen performed well in the HYROX race, but there are areas where he can make improvements to enhance his performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as strength training, improving transition time, and working on running technique, Gerard can optimize his performance in the identified segments and overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Der Bilt Collin | 2024 Maastricht | 01:20:33 | |
| Gödde Martin | 2024 Berlin | 01:21:13 | |
| Oliver Glen | 2022 London | 01:20:34 | |
| Ashley David | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:38 | |
| Graf Alexander | 2023 Hamburg | 01:20:44 | |
| Alfonso Moreno Javier | 2023 München | 01:20:57 | |
| Fettig Lukas | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:21:20 | |
| Kleinknecht Florian | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:21:15 | |
| Allroggen Yann | 2024 Marseille | 01:20:40 | |
| Lajoye Darby | 2019 New York | 01:21:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:13:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
