Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Marsh Sam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Marsh Sam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Marsh Sam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Marsh Sam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:47 | 45:36 to 41:49 | 74.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:43 | 02:46 to 02:03 | 14.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:12 | 04:52 to 04:40 | 3.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:12 | 06:18 to 06:06 | 3.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:30 to 04:23 | 2.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 02:46 to 02:43 | 1.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Marsh Sam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:08 | 00:00 | 04:38 -00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 04:08 | 04:27 +00:03 | 04:38 -00:30 |
| Running 2 | 05:11 | 08:38 | 04:59 +00:12 | 09:05 -00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 13:49 | 02:56 -00:10 | 14:04 -00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:42 | 16:35 | 05:25 +00:17 | 17:00 -00:25 |
| Sled Pull | 04:52 | 22:17 | 05:00 -00:08 | 22:25 -00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:53 | 27:09 | 05:25 +00:28 | 27:25 -00:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:01 | 33:02 | 05:20 -01:19 | 32:50 +00:12 |
| Running 5 | 06:07 | 37:03 | 05:35 +00:32 | 38:10 -01:07 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 43:10 | 04:49 -00:11 | 43:45 -00:35 |
| Running 6 | 06:09 | 47:48 | 05:28 +00:41 | 48:34 -00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:46 | 53:57 | 02:12 +00:34 | 54:02 -00:05 |
| Running 7 | 06:09 | 56:43 | 05:25 +00:44 | 56:14 +00:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:38 | 01:02:52 | 05:07 -00:29 | 01:01:39 +01:13 |
| Running 8 | 06:21 | 01:07:30 | 06:03 +00:18 | 01:06:46 +00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 06:18 | 01:13:51 | 06:33 -00:15 | 01:12:49 +01:02 |
| Roxzone | 06:18 | 01:26:18 | 06:56 -00:38 | 01:26:18 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Sam has a balanced profile, with no significant strengths or weaknesses in either running or strength-based exercises. However, his total running time of 00:45:36 was 04:07 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from improving his running performance.
In conclusion, Sam Marsh's performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race was commendable, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his future performances. By focusing on improving his running performance, strengthening his grip and upper body for the farmers carry segment, and implementing effective race strategies, he can elevate his performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De Vries Daan | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:25:48 | |
| Kleber Tim | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:25:55 | |
| Telgen Anne | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:26:16 | |
| Eide Øyvind | 2024 Stockholm | 01:25:51 | |
| Zehetbauer Ralf | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:26:33 | |
| Bretting Eric | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:26:39 | |
| Dervey Jacky | 2024 Marseille | 01:25:54 | |
| Cremonini Daniele | 2023 Milan | 01:25:48 | |
| Herold Chad | 2024 Houston | 01:26:46 | |
| Prentice Kevin | 2024 Madrid | 01:26:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Madrid | 01:18:26 | |
| 2024 Madrid | 01:22:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
