Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Coupe Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Coupe Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Coupe Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Coupe Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:51 | 46:00 to 41:09 | 84.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:55 | 03:34 to 02:39 | 15.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Coupe Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:29 | 00:00 | 04:33 -01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 03:29 | 04:25 -00:11 | 04:33 -01:04 |
| Running 2 | 08:29 | 07:43 | 04:53 +03:36 | 08:58 -01:15 |
| Sled Push | 03:34 | 16:12 | 02:52 +00:42 | 13:51 +02:21 |
| Running 3 | 06:10 | 19:46 | 05:20 +00:50 | 16:43 +03:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:20 | 25:56 | 04:51 -00:31 | 22:03 +03:53 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 30:16 | 05:18 +00:24 | 26:54 +03:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:45 | 35:58 | 05:12 -00:27 | 32:12 +03:46 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 40:43 | 05:28 +00:20 | 37:24 +03:19 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 46:31 | 04:47 -00:15 | 42:52 +03:39 |
| Running 6 | 05:25 | 51:03 | 05:20 +00:05 | 47:39 +03:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 56:28 | 02:09 -00:18 | 52:59 +03:29 |
| Running 7 | 05:18 | 58:19 | 05:19 -00:01 | 55:08 +03:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:30 | 01:03:37 | 04:59 -00:29 | 01:00:27 +03:10 |
| Running 8 | 05:44 | 01:08:07 | 05:54 -00:10 | 01:05:26 +02:41 |
| Wall Balls | 05:02 | 01:13:51 | 06:19 -01:17 | 01:11:20 +02:31 |
| Roxzone | 05:34 | 01:24:18 | 06:39 -01:05 | 01:24:18 |
Mark Coupe performed commendably in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking in the top 31% overall and top 35% in his age group. His overall time was 01:24:18, showing a balanced approach between strength and endurance. Notably, his running performance, with a total time of 00:46:00, was slower than average, indicating room for improvement in endurance. Despite this, Mark is a strong performer in strength-based exercises, with particularly impressive times in Wall Balls and Farmers Carry. His initial running split was significantly faster than average, suggesting a potentially unsustainable starting pace. His performance profile suggests he leans more towards strength but is quite capable in hybrid tasks.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De Koekkoek Friso | 2023 Barcelona | 01:23:49 | |
| Franz Andre | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:23:59 | |
| Dietrich Sven | 2024 Cape Town | 01:24:38 | |
| Fasulkey Zander | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:44 | |
| Geiß Andreas | 2018 Hamburg | 01:24:29 | |
| Telgen AnneJan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:46 | |
| Hopson Jack | 2024 London | 01:24:02 | |
| Paul Weston | 2023 Anaheim | 01:24:44 | |
| Tomsheck Josh | 2022 Chicago | 01:24:32 | |
| Ansari Jahaan | 2023 Anaheim | 01:24:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:23:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
