Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ballantyne Ian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ballantyne Ian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ballantyne Ian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ballantyne Ian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:28 | 05:58 to 04:30 | 33.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:28 | 06:58 to 05:30 | 33.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 04:52 to 04:15 | 14.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:26 | 02:54 to 02:28 | 9.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:23 | 04:49 to 04:26 | 8.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:38 to 38:38 | 0.0% |
| Ballantyne Ian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:59 | 00:00 | 04:24 +00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 04:59 | 04:22 -00:07 | 04:24 +00:35 |
| Running 2 | 04:19 | 09:14 | 04:45 -00:26 | 08:46 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 13:33 | 02:44 +00:10 | 13:31 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 04:31 | 16:27 | 05:08 -00:37 | 16:15 +00:12 |
| Sled Pull | 04:52 | 20:58 | 04:36 +00:16 | 21:23 -00:25 |
| Running 4 | 04:39 | 25:50 | 05:06 -00:27 | 25:59 -00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:58 | 30:29 | 04:57 +01:01 | 31:05 -00:36 |
| Running 5 | 04:53 | 36:27 | 05:16 -00:23 | 36:02 +00:25 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 41:20 | 04:41 -00:16 | 41:18 +00:02 |
| Running 6 | 04:55 | 45:45 | 05:09 -00:14 | 45:59 -00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 50:40 | 02:04 -00:13 | 51:08 -00:28 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 52:31 | 05:07 -00:03 | 53:12 -00:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:49 | 57:35 | 04:47 +00:02 | 58:19 -00:44 |
| Running 8 | 05:22 | 01:02:24 | 05:36 -00:14 | 01:03:06 -00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 06:58 | 01:07:46 | 06:01 +00:57 | 01:08:42 -00:56 |
| Roxzone | 06:24 | 01:20:58 | 06:15 +00:09 | 01:20:58 |
Firstly, congratulations to Ian Ballantyne for his commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham event. Ian finished in the top 24% of all athletes and top 22% of his age group, an impressive feat considering the competitive field of 4107 athletes. Hats off! Ian’s strength is clearly in his running, with his total running time being 02:07 faster than the average. This has greatly contributed to his overall time of 01:20:58. However, there is some evidence of inconsistent pacing in the early running segments, with Ian starting slower than the average in Running 1 but picking up speed in the subsequent segments. This suggests a potential need to work on pacing strategies. Ian appears to have a runner profile, but there are areas in the strength segments that need improvement.
Specifically, Ian's performance in the following segments indicates room for improvement:
For better performance in future races, Ian could consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dombaxe Davy | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:20:36 | |
| Novas Luis | 2024 New York | 01:21:05 | |
| Bush David | 2022 Birmingham | 01:20:32 | |
| Johansson Jonathan | 2024 Stockholm | 01:20:42 | |
| Haverkort Niels | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:05 | |
| Massouf Fred | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:20:34 | |
| Nixon Nathaniel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:53 | |
| Ugarte Nanclares Iñigo | 2024 Madrid | 01:20:49 | |
| Shipman David | 2023 London | 01:20:40 | |
| Mccallum Brian | 2024 Dublin | 01:21:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
