Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tuckley Janice's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tuckley Janice's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tuckley Janice's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tuckley Janice's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:54 | 51:33 to 47:39 | 64.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:03 | 06:03 to 05:00 | 17.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:56 | 07:23 to 06:27 | 15.5% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:35 to 05:27 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Tuckley Janice | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:50 | 00:00 | 05:18 +00:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:04 | 05:50 | 05:12 -00:08 | 05:18 +00:32 |
| Running 2 | 06:01 | 10:54 | 05:46 +00:15 | 10:30 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 16:55 | 02:50 -00:13 | 16:16 +00:39 |
| Running 3 | 06:08 | 19:32 | 06:07 +00:01 | 19:06 +00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 04:39 | 25:40 | 06:06 -01:27 | 25:13 +00:27 |
| Running 4 | 06:24 | 30:19 | 06:05 +00:19 | 31:19 -01:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:23 | 36:43 | 06:38 +00:45 | 37:24 -00:41 |
| Running 5 | 06:39 | 44:06 | 06:15 +00:24 | 44:02 +00:04 |
| Rowing | 05:35 | 50:45 | 05:29 +00:06 | 50:17 +00:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:36 | 56:20 | 06:08 +00:28 | 55:46 +00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 01:02:56 | 02:23 -00:25 | 01:01:54 +01:02 |
| Running 7 | 06:35 | 01:04:54 | 06:07 +00:28 | 01:04:17 +00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:03 | 01:11:29 | 05:07 +00:56 | 01:10:24 +01:05 |
| Running 8 | 07:22 | 01:17:32 | 06:40 +00:42 | 01:15:31 +02:01 |
| Wall Balls | 04:15 | 01:24:54 | 05:26 -01:11 | 01:22:11 +02:43 |
| Roxzone | 06:08 | 01:35:12 | 07:35 -01:27 | 01:35:12 |
Janice's best running lap was 00:05:50, indicating good speed and endurance during that segment. However, she struggled in some other segments, losing time compared to the average.
In summary, Janice Tuckley had a strong performance in the 2023 London HYROX race, but there are areas where she can improve. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and improving transitions, she can enhance her overall performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Robles Moreno Samanda | 2022 Madrid | 01:35:16 | |
| Hartson Diana | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:57 | |
| Matasán De La Hoz Ana | 2024 Madrid | 01:35:26 | |
| Kärnekull Cornelia | 2024 Stockholm | 01:35:33 | |
| Dawson Heidi | 2024 Stockholm | 01:35:22 | |
| Csongarova Maria | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:35:17 | |
| Heikens Lisa | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:35:13 | |
| Xenikakis Eva | 2022 Essen | 01:35:05 | |
| Pigeon Lisa | 2019 New York | 01:35:41 | |
| Zielinska Beata | 2022 London | 01:35:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:40:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
