Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 694 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Friedrichs Ina's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Friedrichs Ina's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Friedrichs Ina's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Friedrichs Ina's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:10 | 09:18 to 06:08 | 46.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:41 | 09:14 to 07:33 | 24.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:57 | 07:40 to 06:43 | 14.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:48 | 03:58 to 03:10 | 11.8% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 05:47 to 05:42 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 05:27 to 05:24 | 0.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:36 to 02:33 | 0.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:48 to 47:48 | 0.0% |
| Friedrichs Ina | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:23 | 00:00 | 05:41 -01:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:27 | 04:23 | 05:24 +00:03 | 05:41 -01:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:52 | 09:50 | 06:14 -00:22 | 11:05 -01:15 |
| Sled Push | 03:58 | 15:42 | 03:10 +00:48 | 17:19 -01:37 |
| Running 3 | 06:33 | 19:40 | 06:38 -00:05 | 20:29 -00:49 |
| Sled Pull | 07:40 | 26:13 | 06:49 +00:51 | 27:07 -00:54 |
| Running 4 | 09:01 | 33:53 | 06:39 +02:22 | 33:56 -00:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:14 | 42:54 | 07:53 +01:21 | 40:35 +02:19 |
| Running 5 | 04:31 | 52:08 | 06:51 -02:20 | 48:28 +03:40 |
| Rowing | 05:47 | 56:39 | 05:46 +00:01 | 55:19 +01:20 |
| Running 6 | 06:26 | 01:02:26 | 06:45 -00:19 | 01:01:05 +01:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 01:08:52 | 02:34 +00:02 | 01:07:50 +01:02 |
| Running 7 | 06:01 | 01:11:28 | 06:44 -00:43 | 01:10:24 +01:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:22 | 01:17:29 | 05:51 -00:29 | 01:17:08 +00:21 |
| Running 8 | 05:05 | 01:22:51 | 07:27 -02:22 | 01:22:59 -00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 09:18 | 01:27:56 | 06:21 +02:57 | 01:30:26 -02:30 |
| Roxzone | 08:21 | 01:45:35 | 08:48 -00:27 | 01:45:35 |
Based on her splits analysis, Ina had some standout performances in certain segments. Her best running lap was completed in 00:04:23, which was 01:05 faster than the average. She also performed well in Running 2, Running 3, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Farmers Carry, where she was faster than the average time.
Additionally, Ina should focus on proper transition times in the roxzone. Improving her overall fitness and reducing transition time will help her gain an advantage over her competitors. Incorporating interval training and circuit workouts into her training routine will help improve her overall fitness and endurance.
In summary, Ina Friedrichs showed a strong overall performance in the HYROX race in Hamburg. While she excelled in certain segments, there are areas for improvement, such as Wall Balls, Running 4, Burpees Broad Jump, Sled Pull, and Sled Push. By implementing the specific training strategies and techniques mentioned above, Ina can enhance her performance in these areas and further improve her overall race results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Osborne Helen | 2023 London | 01:45:54 | |
| Peshimam Niha | 2023 London | 01:45:48 | |
| Von Zscherlitzky Melinda | 2024 Melbourne | 01:45:26 | |
| Neuks Trine | 2023 Malmö | 01:45:13 | |
| Constant Thibaut Amélie | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:45:57 | |
| Dmitrieva Alina | 2022 Leipzig | 01:45:45 | |
| Rogers Katey | 2022 London | 01:45:15 | |
| Loyola Monserrat | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:45:50 | |
| Desrumaux Aurelie | 2023 Paris | 01:45:10 | |
| Poulter Kara | 2022 New York | 01:45:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Hamburg | 01:33:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
