Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 557 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Geilvoet Merel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Geilvoet Merel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Geilvoet Merel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Geilvoet Merel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:30 | 01:02:02 to 53:32 | 81.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:27 | 09:31 to 08:04 | 13.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:33 | 06:34 to 06:01 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Geilvoet Merel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:46 | 00:00 | 05:46 -02:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:05 | 03:46 | 05:29 -00:24 | 05:46 -02:00 |
| Running 2 | 07:39 | 08:51 | 06:25 +01:14 | 11:15 -02:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 16:30 | 03:20 -00:51 | 17:40 -01:10 |
| Running 3 | 07:57 | 18:59 | 06:48 +01:09 | 21:00 -02:01 |
| Sled Pull | 05:23 | 26:56 | 07:12 -01:49 | 27:48 -00:52 |
| Running 4 | 07:51 | 32:19 | 06:53 +00:58 | 35:00 -02:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:31 | 40:10 | 08:18 +01:13 | 41:53 -01:43 |
| Running 5 | 08:28 | 49:41 | 07:09 +01:19 | 50:11 -00:30 |
| Rowing | 05:27 | 58:09 | 05:49 -00:22 | 57:20 +00:49 |
| Running 6 | 08:23 | 01:03:36 | 06:58 +01:25 | 01:03:09 +00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 01:11:59 | 02:38 -00:41 | 01:10:07 +01:52 |
| Running 7 | 08:17 | 01:13:56 | 07:00 +01:17 | 01:12:45 +01:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:34 | 01:22:13 | 06:16 +00:18 | 01:19:45 +02:28 |
| Running 8 | 09:45 | 01:28:47 | 07:47 +01:58 | 01:26:01 +02:46 |
| Wall Balls | 04:19 | 01:38:32 | 06:40 -02:21 | 01:33:48 +04:44 |
| Roxzone | 06:53 | 01:49:35 | 09:07 -02:14 | 01:49:35 |
Merel showed exceptional performance in the Running 1 segment, finishing 01:48 faster than the average time. She also excelled in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, finishing 00:23 and 01:15 faster than the average, respectively. However, she struggled in the Running 2, Running 3, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, Running 8, and Sandbag Lunges segments, finishing slower than the average times.
In conclusion, Merel Geilvoet performed well in the Hyrox race, achieving a high overall rank and placing in the top 21% of athletes. While she showed strengths in certain segments, there are areas for improvement, particularly in running segments and specific exercises. By implementing the suggested training strategies, techniques, and race strategies, Merel can further enhance her performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vining Brittany | 2024 Brisbane | 01:49:16 | |
| Proudman Katy | 2024 Manchester | 01:49:20 | |
| Reynolds Natalie | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:49:35 | |
| Mcdonagh Katie | 2024 Dublin | 01:49:34 | |
| Renner Lisa | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:49:41 | |
| Tee Su Mien | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:49:35 | |
| Cacerez Eva Luz | 2022 Valencia | 01:49:08 | |
| Barrord Elizabeth | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:49:49 | |
| Lauterjung Viola | 2024 Maastricht | 01:49:16 | |
| Green Hannah | 2024 London | 01:49:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:19:13 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
