Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Leipzig using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bennedsen Frank's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bennedsen Frank's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bennedsen Frank's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bennedsen Frank's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:53 | 44:02 to 41:09 | 56.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:39 | 07:34 to 05:55 | 32.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:29 | 05:22 to 04:53 | 9.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:26 to 04:21 | 1.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Bennedsen Frank | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:43 | 00:00 | 04:34 +00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 04:43 | 04:25 +00:01 | 04:34 +00:09 |
| Running 2 | 05:14 | 09:09 | 04:54 +00:20 | 08:59 +00:10 |
| Sled Push | 01:45 | 14:23 | 02:52 -01:07 | 13:53 +00:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:19 | 16:08 | 05:21 -00:02 | 16:45 -00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 03:35 | 21:27 | 04:51 -01:16 | 22:06 -00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 25:02 | 05:19 +00:04 | 26:57 -01:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:22 | 30:25 | 05:12 +00:10 | 32:16 -01:51 |
| Running 5 | 05:47 | 35:47 | 05:29 +00:18 | 37:28 -01:41 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 41:34 | 04:47 -00:08 | 42:57 -01:23 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 46:13 | 05:20 +00:14 | 47:44 -01:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 51:47 | 02:08 -00:12 | 53:04 -01:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:38 | 53:43 | 05:19 +00:19 | 55:12 -01:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:40 | 59:21 | 04:59 -00:19 | 01:00:31 -01:10 |
| Running 8 | 06:27 | 01:04:01 | 05:54 +00:33 | 01:05:30 -01:29 |
| Wall Balls | 07:34 | 01:10:28 | 06:19 +01:15 | 01:11:24 -00:56 |
| Roxzone | 06:27 | 01:24:22 | 06:39 -00:12 | 01:24:22 |
Frank's best running lap was 00:04:43, which indicates that he has good running speed and endurance. However, there were several areas where he lost time compared to the average, including the Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, and the Roxzone. It is important for Frank to address these areas of weakness in order to improve his overall performance.
In conclusion, Frank Bennedsen had a strong performance in the HYROX race in Leipzig. While he performed well in certain segments, there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as improving explosive power, upper body strength, and overall fitness, Frank can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lenton Charles | 2024 Paris | 01:23:58 | |
| Beckers Tobias | 2019 Essen | 01:24:27 | |
| Mcinerney Craig | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:49 | |
| Schwimmbeck Lukas | 2024 Köln | 01:23:53 | |
| Mcdaniel Chase | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:23:55 | |
| Jung Suhyun | 2024 Incheon | 01:24:25 | |
| Wróblewski Adrian | 2024 Poznan | 01:24:09 | |
| Blackham Jack | 2022 London | 01:24:43 | |
| Wimberger Andreas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:24:36 | |
| Schlag Yannic | 2021 Hamburg | 01:24:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2018 Essen | 01:29:46 | |
| 2019 Oberhausen | 01:21:50 | |
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:46:58 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
