Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 434 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Timmers Jip's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Timmers Jip's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Timmers Jip's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Timmers Jip's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 12:08 | 01:06:21 to 54:13 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:59 to 02:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:53 to 05:53 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:26 to 07:26 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:51 to 02:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:55 to 06:55 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 09:36 to 09:36 | 0.0% |
| Timmers Jip | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:14 | 00:00 | 05:35 -01:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 04:14 | 04:55 -00:08 | 05:35 -01:21 |
| Running 2 | 08:17 | 09:01 | 06:23 +01:54 | 10:30 -01:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:59 | 17:18 | 03:57 -00:58 | 16:53 +00:25 |
| Running 3 | 08:47 | 20:17 | 07:06 +01:41 | 20:50 -00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 05:53 | 29:04 | 06:59 -01:06 | 27:56 +01:08 |
| Running 4 | 08:53 | 34:57 | 07:07 +01:46 | 34:55 +00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:26 | 43:50 | 08:26 -01:00 | 42:02 +01:48 |
| Running 5 | 08:57 | 51:16 | 07:31 +01:26 | 50:28 +00:48 |
| Rowing | 05:13 | 01:00:13 | 05:30 -00:17 | 57:59 +02:14 |
| Running 6 | 08:40 | 01:05:26 | 07:14 +01:26 | 01:03:29 +01:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:51 | 01:14:06 | 02:53 -00:02 | 01:10:43 +03:23 |
| Running 7 | 08:43 | 01:16:57 | 07:14 +01:29 | 01:13:36 +03:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:55 | 01:25:40 | 07:51 -00:56 | 01:20:50 +04:50 |
| Running 8 | 09:54 | 01:32:35 | 09:05 +00:49 | 01:28:41 +03:54 |
| Wall Balls | 09:36 | 01:42:29 | 10:00 -00:24 | 01:37:46 +04:43 |
| Roxzone | 06:43 | 01:58:39 | 10:53 -04:10 | 01:58:39 |
Jip Timmers completed the Hyrox race at the 2024 Amsterdam event with an overall time of 01:58:39, ranking within the top 67% of all athletes. In his age group (25-29), he ranked in the top 68%. His performance indicates a strong ability in strength-based exercises, as seen in his faster-than-average times in segments like the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Burpees Broad Jump. However, his total running time was 08:41 slower than average, suggesting that running is an area requiring significant improvement. The initial running segment was notably strong, indicating a tendency to start fast, but subsequent running segments showed a decline, suggesting pacing issues. Overall, Jip demonstrates a hybrid profile with a stronger inclination towards strength exercises over running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nardone Dario | 2024 Turin | 01:59:06 | |
| Welsh Christopher | 2022 London | 01:58:36 | |
| Ng Jason | 2024 Melbourne | 01:58:57 | |
| Holz Fabian | 2020 Hannover | 01:58:49 | |
| Fantin Alessandro | 2024 Rimini | 01:58:26 | |
| Wiersum Bram | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:58:43 | |
| Cedervi Marcus | 2023 Stockholm | 01:58:10 | |
| Ali Kemol | 2021 New York | 01:59:03 | |
| Gee Jonathan | 2024 Manchester | 01:59:04 | |
| Tranaso Marco | 2024 Turin | 01:58:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
