Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Feij Jill's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Feij Jill's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Feij Jill's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Feij Jill's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:40 | 48:14 to 46:34 | 34.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:04 | 06:43 to 05:39 | 21.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:57 | 03:39 to 02:42 | 19.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:35 | 06:44 to 06:09 | 12.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:28 | 05:35 to 05:07 | 9.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 04:57 to 04:49 | 2.7% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:19 to 05:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:34 to 01:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Feij Jill | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:04 | 00:00 | 05:16 -01:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:35 | 04:04 | 05:10 +00:25 | 05:16 -01:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:45 | 09:39 | 05:37 +00:08 | 10:26 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 03:39 | 15:24 | 02:50 +00:49 | 16:03 -00:39 |
| Running 3 | 06:31 | 19:03 | 05:54 +00:37 | 18:53 +00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 06:43 | 25:34 | 05:59 +00:44 | 24:47 +00:47 |
| Running 4 | 06:32 | 32:17 | 05:57 +00:35 | 30:46 +01:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:44 | 38:49 | 06:30 +00:14 | 36:43 +02:06 |
| Running 5 | 06:42 | 45:33 | 06:07 +00:35 | 43:13 +02:20 |
| Rowing | 05:19 | 52:15 | 05:27 -00:08 | 49:20 +02:55 |
| Running 6 | 06:09 | 57:34 | 06:00 +00:09 | 54:47 +02:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:34 | 01:03:43 | 02:18 -00:44 | 01:00:47 +02:56 |
| Running 7 | 05:57 | 01:05:17 | 05:57 +00:00 | 01:03:05 +02:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:57 | 01:11:14 | 05:01 -00:04 | 01:09:02 +02:12 |
| Running 8 | 06:36 | 01:16:11 | 06:29 +00:07 | 01:14:03 +02:08 |
| Wall Balls | 04:39 | 01:22:47 | 05:13 -00:34 | 01:20:32 +02:15 |
| Roxzone | 05:50 | 01:33:07 | 07:22 -01:32 | 01:33:07 |
In terms of running performance, Jill's total running time was 00:48:14, which is 01:34 slower than the average. This indicates that she may need to focus on improving her running speed and efficiency. Her best running lap was 00:04:04, which was 00:59 faster than the average, showing that she has the potential to excel in running.
For each of these segments, specific training strategies and techniques are recommended:
1. Run Total: This segment had the most time lost compared to the average. To improve this, Jill should focus on increasing her overall fitness and stamina. Incorporating interval training, tempo runs, and hill sprints can help improve her running speed and endurance.
2. Burpees Broad Jump: Jill lost significant time in this segment. She should work on improving her burpee technique to make it more efficient. Practicing explosive jumps and incorporating plyometric exercises, such as box jumps and squat jumps, can help improve her power and speed in this movement.
3. Running 3, 4, and 5: These running segments showed slower times compared to the average. Jill should focus on improving her running form and technique. Incorporating drills such as high knees, butt kicks, and stride lengthening exercises can help improve her running efficiency and speed.
4. Ski Erg: Jill's time in this segment was slower than the average. She should work on improving her technique and efficiency on the Ski Erg machine. Incorporating specific Ski Erg workouts and focusing on proper form, including engaging the core and maintaining a smooth rhythm, can help improve her performance.
5. Sled Pull and Sled Push: Jill lost time in both the sled pull and sled push segments. To improve these, she should focus on building strength in her lower body and core. Incorporating exercises such as squats, deadlifts, lunges, and planks can help improve her power and stability for these movements.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the recommended training techniques, Jill Feij can enhance her performance in future Hyrox races. It is important for her to tailor her training routines to address her specific areas of improvement and to continually assess her progress to make further adjustments as necessary.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuller Verity | 2024 Manchester | 01:33:33 | |
| Van Kasteren Coco | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:33:15 | |
| Harsch Juliane | 2023 Hamburg | 01:33:30 | |
| Harper Helen | 2023 Manchester | 01:33:16 | |
| Brand Rifka | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:33:04 | |
| Klings Felicitas | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:33:28 | |
| Borell Ghelu Mae | 2023 Stockholm | 01:33:16 | |
| Wrobel Martha | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:32:45 | |
| Romano Bethany | 2022 Chicago | 01:33:29 | |
| Van Der Corput Nikki | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:33:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
