Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Astbury Steven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Astbury Steven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Astbury Steven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Astbury Steven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:45 | 08:50 to 08:05 | 45.9% |
| Run Total | 00:33 | 49:23 to 48:50 | 33.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 06:17 to 05:57 | 20.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:41 to 02:41 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:36 to 06:36 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:44 to 05:44 | 0.0% |
| Astbury Steven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:59 | 00:00 | 05:13 +00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 05:59 | 04:42 +00:01 | 05:13 +00:46 |
| Running 2 | 05:22 | 10:42 | 05:43 -00:21 | 09:55 +00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:41 | 16:04 | 03:30 -00:49 | 15:38 +00:26 |
| Running 3 | 06:03 | 18:45 | 06:17 -00:14 | 19:08 -00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 06:17 | 24:48 | 06:04 +00:13 | 25:25 -00:37 |
| Running 4 | 06:18 | 31:05 | 06:16 +00:02 | 31:29 -00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:36 | 37:23 | 06:57 -00:21 | 37:45 -00:22 |
| Running 5 | 06:29 | 43:59 | 06:32 -00:03 | 44:42 -00:43 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 50:28 | 05:12 -00:05 | 51:14 -00:46 |
| Running 6 | 06:05 | 55:35 | 06:21 -00:16 | 56:26 -00:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 01:01:40 | 02:36 -00:29 | 01:02:47 -01:07 |
| Running 7 | 06:02 | 01:03:47 | 06:20 -00:18 | 01:05:23 -01:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:44 | 01:09:49 | 06:25 -00:41 | 01:11:43 -01:54 |
| Running 8 | 07:08 | 01:15:33 | 07:28 -00:20 | 01:18:08 -02:35 |
| Wall Balls | 08:50 | 01:22:41 | 08:21 +00:29 | 01:25:36 -02:55 |
| Roxzone | 11:35 | 01:42:58 | 09:01 +02:34 | 01:42:58 |
Steven Astbury, a HYROX competitor in the 40-44 age group, has shown a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham event. With an overall rank of 2294 among 4107 athletes, he falls within the top 55%. Within his age group, he ranked 411, placing him in the top 56% of 724 athletes. His total running time of 49:23 was a minute faster than the average, and his best running lap was 5:22.
Steven seems to have a hybrid profile with a slight edge in running, demonstrated by his overall faster running time. However, his pacing might need some improvement. His initial speed in Running 1 was slower than the average by 48 seconds, potentially indicating a slower start than necessary. But he picked up speed in later segments with most of his running segments being faster than average, showing a strong level of endurance.
For future races, Steven might consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| White Tommy | 2023 Dallas | 01:42:49 | |
| Barone Giuliano | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:42:38 | |
| Curtis Ben | 2023 Glasgow | 01:42:58 | |
| Lacroix Julien | 2024 Paris | 01:43:24 | |
| Kasmi Amine | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:43:06 | |
| Simms Louis | 2024 Malaga | 01:42:31 | |
| Harris Cade | 2023 Dallas | 01:42:45 | |
| Teague Mark | 2024 Glasgow | 01:43:23 | |
| Mondeel Nick | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:42:49 | |
| Pugliese Francesco | 2024 Rimini | 01:42:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
