Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hogg Brook's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hogg Brook's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hogg Brook's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hogg Brook's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:15 | 12:05 to 07:50 | 62.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:15 | 03:45 to 02:30 | 18.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 | 03:56 to 03:23 | 8.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:59 to 04:41 | 4.4% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:18 to 05:06 | 2.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 05:58 to 05:47 | 2.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:04 | 06:35 to 06:31 | 1.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:31 to 05:31 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:06 to 43:06 | 0.0% |
| Hogg Brook | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 05:08 +00:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:59 | 05:29 | 04:40 +00:19 | 05:08 +00:21 |
| Running 2 | 04:59 | 10:28 | 05:37 -00:38 | 09:48 +00:40 |
| Sled Push | 03:56 | 15:27 | 03:25 +00:31 | 15:25 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 19:23 | 06:07 -00:57 | 18:50 +00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 05:58 | 24:33 | 05:54 +00:04 | 24:57 -00:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 30:31 | 06:08 -00:52 | 30:51 -00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:35 | 35:47 | 06:40 -00:05 | 36:59 -01:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 42:22 | 06:25 -00:54 | 43:39 -01:17 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 47:53 | 05:09 +00:09 | 50:04 -02:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:14 | 53:11 | 06:14 -01:00 | 55:13 -02:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:45 | 58:25 | 02:34 +01:11 | 01:01:27 -03:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:14 | 01:02:10 | 06:13 -00:59 | 01:04:01 -01:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:31 | 01:07:24 | 06:17 -00:46 | 01:10:14 -02:50 |
| Running 8 | 06:17 | 01:12:55 | 07:16 -00:59 | 01:16:31 -03:36 |
| Wall Balls | 12:05 | 01:19:12 | 08:14 +03:51 | 01:23:47 -04:35 |
| Roxzone | 09:37 | 01:40:46 | 08:45 +00:52 | 01:40:46 |
Brook Hogg, a young athlete in the 16-24 age group, delivered a solid performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. His overall rank was 2234, placing him in the top 54% of all athletes. In his age group, he achieved a commendable rank of 148, falling in the top 46%. The total time taken by Brook was 01:40:46 and his total running time was 00:43:06, which is 06:15 faster than the average. This suggests that Brook has a strong runner profile and his running abilities are a key strength.
However, the Roxzone time shows room for improvement, as it was 00:54 slower than the average. This could indicate a need for better transitioning and overall fitness. An in-depth analysis of the individual segments reveals that Brook started the race slightly slower than the average during Running 1, but consistently improved his pace, outperforming the average times in the subsequent running segments.
Brook should consider implementing the following strategies to improve his overall race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bennett James | 2023 Sydney | 01:40:17 | |
| Boal Austin | 2024 Anaheim | 01:40:39 | |
| Pastore Nick | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:40:58 | |
| Iwesitsch Thomas | 2022 Leipzig | 01:41:06 | |
| Losch Maik | 2024 Berlin | 01:40:25 | |
| Wong Peter | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:40:40 | |
| Fleissner Frank | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:40:40 | |
| Farrell Matthew | 2024 Stockholm | 01:41:07 | |
| Duncan Erik | 2024 Birmingham | 01:40:44 | |
| Salazar Daniel | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:40:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
