Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clark Lewis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clark Lewis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clark Lewis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clark Lewis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:57 | 06:51 to 04:54 | 39.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:44 | 02:53 to 02:09 | 14.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:43 | 06:05 to 05:22 | 14.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 03:32 to 02:52 | 13.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:35 | 07:03 to 06:28 | 11.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:38 to 04:27 | 3.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 05:10 to 05:07 | 1.0% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:51 to 04:49 | 0.7% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:41 to 40:41 | 0.0% |
| Clark Lewis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:44 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 04:44 | 04:30 +00:08 | 04:45 -00:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:22 | 09:22 | 05:06 -00:44 | 09:15 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 03:32 | 13:44 | 03:01 +00:31 | 14:21 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:07 | 17:16 | 05:34 -00:27 | 17:22 -00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 06:51 | 22:23 | 05:09 +01:42 | 22:56 -00:33 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 29:14 | 05:33 -00:15 | 28:05 +01:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:05 | 34:32 | 05:40 +00:25 | 33:38 +00:54 |
| Running 5 | 05:30 | 40:37 | 05:44 -00:14 | 39:18 +01:19 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 46:07 | 04:53 -00:02 | 45:02 +01:05 |
| Running 6 | 05:11 | 50:58 | 05:35 -00:24 | 49:55 +01:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:53 | 56:09 | 02:16 +00:37 | 55:30 +00:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:53 | 59:02 | 05:34 -00:41 | 57:46 +01:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:10 | 01:03:55 | 05:24 -00:14 | 01:03:20 +00:35 |
| Running 8 | 05:37 | 01:09:05 | 06:15 -00:38 | 01:08:44 +00:21 |
| Wall Balls | 07:03 | 01:14:42 | 06:52 +00:11 | 01:14:59 -00:17 |
| Roxzone | 07:26 | 01:29:06 | 07:15 +00:11 | 01:29:06 |
Lewis Clark demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event. His overall rank was in the top 39% among 4107 athletes, and within his age group of 16-24, he ranked in the top 36%. Particularly impressive was his running performance. His total running time was 03:44 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Analyzing his pacing, Lewis started out slightly faster than average in the initial segments, but managed to maintain a consistent pace throughout, demonstrating his endurance capabilities.
Considering Lewis's strong running profile, he can use this to his advantage during the race. He can aim to gain time during the running segments to compensate for the slower strength segments. Additionally, Lewis could benefit from a strategic pacing plan. Starting out too fast can deplete energy reserves and result in slower times in later segments. A consistent, steady pace throughout the race could result in a better overall time. Lastly, focusing on transition times and implementing the suggested drills in his training routine can help reduce the Roxzone time, ultimately improving his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Casey Michael | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:06 | |
| Muggli Stephan | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:28:42 | |
| Fernandes Junior | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:14 | |
| Taylor Adam | 2023 London | 01:28:57 | |
| Iremonger Rob | 2023 Melbourne | 01:28:49 | |
| Kennedy Roan | 2023 Dublin | 01:28:55 | |
| Quaranta Mirko | 2024 Milan | 01:29:34 | |
| Priebe Ondry | 2024 Milan | 01:28:56 | |
| Macgregor Colin | 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:30 | |
| Stol Ramon | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:28:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
