Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sarrazy Florent's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sarrazy Florent's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sarrazy Florent's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sarrazy Florent's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:05 | 47:45 to 45:40 | 42.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:36 | 06:57 to 05:21 | 32.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:58 | 06:55 to 05:57 | 19.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:17 | 05:52 to 05:35 | 5.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:46 to 02:46 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Sarrazy Florent | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:00 | 00:00 | 04:59 +00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 05:00 | 04:35 -00:03 | 04:59 +00:01 |
| Running 2 | 05:41 | 09:32 | 05:23 +00:18 | 09:34 -00:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 15:13 | 03:11 -00:25 | 14:57 +00:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:55 | 17:59 | 05:53 +00:02 | 18:08 -00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 06:57 | 23:54 | 05:30 +01:27 | 24:01 -00:07 |
| Running 4 | 06:05 | 30:51 | 05:52 +00:13 | 29:31 +01:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:55 | 36:56 | 06:12 +00:43 | 35:23 +01:33 |
| Running 5 | 06:17 | 43:51 | 06:05 +00:12 | 41:35 +02:16 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 50:08 | 05:02 -00:15 | 47:40 +02:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:01 | 54:55 | 05:54 +00:07 | 52:42 +02:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 01:00:56 | 02:24 -00:22 | 58:36 +02:20 |
| Running 7 | 06:04 | 01:02:58 | 05:53 +00:11 | 01:01:00 +01:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:52 | 01:09:02 | 05:49 +00:03 | 01:06:53 +02:09 |
| Running 8 | 06:45 | 01:14:54 | 06:47 -00:02 | 01:12:42 +02:12 |
| Wall Balls | 05:14 | 01:21:39 | 07:30 -02:16 | 01:19:29 +02:10 |
| Roxzone | 08:17 | 01:35:02 | 08:03 +00:14 | 01:35:02 |
Florent Sarrazy's performance in the 2024 Paris HYROX event demonstrated a commendable balance of running and strength. Placing in the top 70% of all athletes and top 68% in his age group, 40-44, highlights his solid performance. Florent's total running time was slightly slower than average by 45 seconds, indicating a potential area for improvement. He demonstrated a particular strength in the Wall Balls segment, finishing 2:14 minutes faster than average, placing him in the top 5% of all athletes. His pacing throughout the race appeared to be consistent, with no significant fluctuations in his segment times. However, his slower start compared to the average in the initial running segments may suggest a potential area for improvement.
Implementing the following strategies during the race could help Florent improve his performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cox Tanner | 2021 Chicago | 01:35:28 | |
| Fenoglio Gabriele | 2024 Milan | 01:35:24 | |
| De Kievit Ad | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:30 | |
| Goh Darren | 2023 Singapore | 01:35:19 | |
| Bate Stefan | 2022 Chicago | 01:35:00 | |
| Iddon James | 2024 Brisbane | 01:34:34 | |
| Lim Ronald | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:34:44 | |
| Tibble Kevin | 2023 Paris | 01:35:17 | |
| Veenstra Roelof | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:35:08 | |
| Mccourt Felix | 2023 Malaga | 01:35:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
