Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 959 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kooijman Tim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kooijman Tim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kooijman Tim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kooijman Tim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:44. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:56 | 09:20 to 06:24 | 62.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:08 | 09:30 to 08:22 | 23.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:40 | 07:36 to 06:56 | 14.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:52 to 02:52 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:51 to 05:51 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 49:12 to 49:12 | 0.0% |
| Kooijman Tim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:59 | 00:00 | 05:15 -01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 03:59 | 04:43 -00:10 | 05:15 -01:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:40 | 08:32 | 05:45 -00:05 | 09:58 -01:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 14:12 | 03:39 -00:47 | 15:43 -01:31 |
| Running 3 | 07:43 | 17:04 | 06:27 +01:16 | 19:22 -02:18 |
| Sled Pull | 05:51 | 24:47 | 06:17 -00:26 | 25:49 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 06:43 | 30:38 | 06:26 +00:17 | 32:06 -01:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:36 | 37:21 | 07:04 +00:32 | 38:32 -01:11 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 44:57 | 06:42 -00:08 | 45:36 -00:39 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 51:31 | 05:15 -00:23 | 52:18 -00:47 |
| Running 6 | 06:01 | 56:23 | 06:30 -00:29 | 57:33 -01:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 01:02:24 | 02:38 -00:52 | 01:04:03 -01:39 |
| Running 7 | 06:19 | 01:04:10 | 06:29 -00:10 | 01:06:41 -02:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:20 | 01:10:29 | 06:37 +02:43 | 01:13:10 -02:41 |
| Running 8 | 06:16 | 01:19:49 | 07:47 -01:31 | 01:19:47 +00:02 |
| Wall Balls | 09:30 | 01:26:05 | 08:39 +00:51 | 01:27:34 -01:29 |
| Roxzone | 10:06 | 01:45:34 | 09:21 +00:45 | 01:45:34 |
Tim Kooijman delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 62% of all athletes and the top 61% of his age group. His overall time of 01:45:34 demonstrates solid endurance and capability. Notably, Tim has a strong running profile, with a total running time of 00:49:12, which is 02:35 faster than average. This suggests that he excels in running compared to strength-focused exercises. His pacing strategy seemed to start strong, particularly in the initial running segments, but there was a noticeable slowdown in the middle portions of the race, indicating a potential early pace that was too fast.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De Leon Roman | 2023 Anaheim | 01:45:45 | |
| Pignitter Manfred | 2022 Wien | 01:45:07 | |
| Gonzales Steven | 2024 Anaheim | 01:45:07 | |
| Hair Leigh | 2023 Melbourne | 01:45:18 | |
| Colpaert Nicolas | 2024 Maastricht | 01:45:23 | |
| Walter Michael | 2023 München | 01:45:06 | |
| Vezies Raoul | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:45:05 | |
| Teo Ru Bin | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:45:46 | |
| Fortunato Alessandro | 2024 Rimini | 01:45:26 | |
| Campbell Anthony | 2024 Malaga | 01:45:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
