Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 601 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Antonsen AnetteMarie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Antonsen AnetteMarie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Antonsen AnetteMarie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Antonsen AnetteMarie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:45 | 10:02 to 06:17 | 76.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:44 | 08:26 to 07:42 | 15.0% |
| Run Total | 00:20 | 52:39 to 52:19 | 6.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 05:29 to 05:25 | 1.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:52 to 02:52 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:44 to 05:44 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:38 to 05:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Antonsen AnetteMarie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:27 | 00:00 | 05:49 +00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:29 | 06:27 | 05:25 +00:04 | 05:49 +00:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:45 | 11:56 | 06:16 -00:31 | 11:14 +00:42 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 17:41 | 03:09 -00:17 | 17:30 +00:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:57 | 20:33 | 06:38 -00:41 | 20:39 -00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 05:44 | 26:30 | 06:58 -01:14 | 27:17 -00:47 |
| Running 4 | 06:14 | 32:14 | 06:41 -00:27 | 34:15 -02:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:26 | 38:28 | 08:03 +00:23 | 40:56 -02:28 |
| Running 5 | 07:03 | 46:54 | 06:55 +00:08 | 48:59 -02:05 |
| Rowing | 05:38 | 53:57 | 05:47 -00:09 | 55:54 -01:57 |
| Running 6 | 06:34 | 59:35 | 06:46 -00:12 | 01:01:41 -02:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 01:06:09 | 02:36 -00:47 | 01:08:27 -02:18 |
| Running 7 | 07:01 | 01:07:58 | 06:44 +00:17 | 01:11:03 -03:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 01:14:59 | 06:01 -01:06 | 01:17:47 -02:48 |
| Running 8 | 07:41 | 01:19:54 | 07:32 +00:09 | 01:23:48 -03:54 |
| Wall Balls | 10:02 | 01:27:35 | 06:34 +03:28 | 01:31:20 -03:45 |
| Roxzone | 09:05 | 01:46:35 | 08:41 +00:24 | 01:46:35 |
AnetteMarie Antonsen has proven herself to be an accomplished athlete, ranking in the top 21% of all contestants and her age group. She finished with an impressive overall time of 01:46:35. Notably, her total running time is 00:59 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, her Roxzone time is slower than average, suggesting that she may need to focus on improving her overall fitness and transition time. Throughout the race, AnetteMarie demonstrated the ability to maintain a good pace. Her performance in the first four running segments shows that she did not start too fast or too slow compared to the average.
AnetteMarie should consider implementing the following strategies during her races for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Taunton Stephanie | 2024 Sydney | 01:46:52 | |
| Monsalve Claudia | 2019 Miami | 01:46:22 | |
| Mcneill Ann Marie | 2023 Glasgow | 01:46:14 | |
| Portillo Iliana Carolina | 2024 Anaheim | 01:46:43 | |
| Brinkley Kristain | 2024 Dallas | 01:46:56 | |
| Pedregon Reyna | 2024 Anaheim | 01:46:57 | |
| Lacherstorfer Gisa | 2023 München | 01:46:27 | |
| Ricci Manuela | 2024 Milan | 01:46:47 | |
| Strickland Sue | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:46:58 | |
| Karkac Ina Therese | 2024 London | 01:46:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
