Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 293 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Muller Arthur's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Muller Arthur's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Muller Arthur's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Muller Arthur's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:36 | 13:22 to 07:46 | 43.6% |
| Run Total | 05:27 | 01:01:50 to 56:23 | 42.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:55 | 08:14 to 07:19 | 7.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:49 | 03:56 to 03:07 | 6.4% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:37 to 05:34 | 0.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:01 | 08:27 to 08:26 | 0.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:40 to 03:40 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:46 to 08:46 | 0.0% |
| Muller Arthur | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:08 | 00:00 | 05:48 -00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 05:08 | 04:58 -00:18 | 05:48 -00:40 |
| Running 2 | 05:34 | 09:48 | 06:28 -00:54 | 10:46 -00:58 |
| Sled Push | 03:40 | 15:22 | 04:18 -00:38 | 17:14 -01:52 |
| Running 3 | 08:42 | 19:02 | 07:29 +01:13 | 21:32 -02:30 |
| Sled Pull | 08:14 | 27:44 | 07:11 +01:03 | 29:01 -01:17 |
| Running 4 | 06:36 | 35:58 | 07:26 -00:50 | 36:12 -00:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:27 | 42:34 | 08:48 -00:21 | 43:38 -01:04 |
| Running 5 | 07:22 | 51:01 | 07:54 -00:32 | 52:26 -01:25 |
| Rowing | 05:37 | 58:23 | 05:37 +00:00 | 01:00:20 -01:57 |
| Running 6 | 07:27 | 01:04:00 | 07:28 -00:01 | 01:05:57 -01:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:56 | 01:11:27 | 02:58 +00:58 | 01:13:25 -01:58 |
| Running 7 | 07:20 | 01:15:23 | 07:30 -00:10 | 01:16:23 -01:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 13:22 | 01:22:43 | 08:21 +05:01 | 01:23:53 -01:10 |
| Running 8 | 08:45 | 01:36:05 | 09:56 -01:11 | 01:32:14 +03:51 |
| Wall Balls | 08:46 | 01:44:50 | 10:47 -02:01 | 01:42:10 +02:40 |
| Roxzone | 10:52 | 02:04:20 | 11:23 -00:31 | 02:04:20 |
Segment Analysis:
1. Sandbag Lunges: Arthur lost significant time in this segment, being 04:59 slower than average. To improve this performance, he should focus on strengthening his leg muscles through exercises such as squats, lunges, and deadlifts. Additionally, practicing the sandbag lunge technique and finding ways to efficiently move the sandbag can help minimize time lost.
2. Run Total: Arthur's total running time was 03:55 slower than average. This indicates that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time. Incorporating HIIT (high-intensity interval training) workouts into his training routine can help boost his cardiovascular endurance and improve his running speed.
3. Running 3: Arthur was 01:05 slower than average in this segment. To enhance his running performance, he should focus on interval training, incorporating both speed work and endurance runs. Adding hill sprints and tempo runs to his training routine can also help improve his running speed and endurance.
4. Farmers Carry: Arthur's time in the Farmers Carry segment was 00:54 slower than average. To improve this performance, he should work on strengthening his grip and upper body strength. Exercises such as farmer's walks, dead hangs, and pull-ups can help improve grip strength and overall performance in the Farmers Carry segment.
5. Sled Pull: Arthur was 00:43 slower than average in the Sled Pull segment. To enhance his performance in this area, he should focus on improving his lower body strength and technique. Incorporating exercises like squats, deadlifts, and sled pulls into his training routine can help improve his strength and speed in this segment.
In conclusion, Arthur Muller had a solid performance in the HYROX race in Amsterdam. By focusing on the identified areas of improvement, such as the Sandbag Lunges, Run Total, Running 3, Farmers Carry, and Sled Pull segments, and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fage Toby | 2024 London | 02:04:11 | |
| Malcolm Andrew | 2024 Birmingham | 02:04:15 | |
| Sen Gupta Mike | 2019 Hamburg | 02:03:53 | |
| Mcclenaghan Reece | 2023 Dublin | 02:04:39 | |
| Chase James | 2022 New York | 02:04:27 | |
| Lal Steven | 2024 Incheon | 02:04:07 | |
| Kerbyson Derick | 2022 Dallas | 02:04:15 | |
| Harris Darren | 2024 London | 02:03:52 | |
| Collins Sam | 2024 Stockholm | 02:04:13 | |
| Cotton Ian | 2024 Birmingham | 02:04:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
