Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mackaaij Wim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mackaaij Wim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mackaaij Wim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mackaaij Wim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:36 | 08:12 to 06:36 | 31.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:19 | 06:32 to 05:13 | 25.6% |
| Run Total | 01:13 | 44:56 to 43:43 | 23.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:41 | 06:10 to 05:29 | 13.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:39 to 04:29 | 3.2% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 05:00 to 04:51 | 2.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Mackaaij Wim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:59 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:39 | 03:59 | 04:31 +00:08 | 04:45 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 05:34 | 08:38 | 05:09 +00:25 | 09:16 -00:38 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 14:12 | 03:04 -00:21 | 14:25 -00:13 |
| Running 3 | 05:52 | 16:55 | 05:38 +00:14 | 17:29 -00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 22:47 | 05:15 -00:34 | 23:07 -00:20 |
| Running 4 | 05:52 | 27:28 | 05:37 +00:15 | 28:22 -00:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:10 | 33:20 | 05:46 +00:24 | 33:59 -00:39 |
| Running 5 | 05:44 | 39:30 | 05:49 -00:05 | 39:45 -00:15 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 45:14 | 04:55 +00:05 | 45:34 -00:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:48 | 50:14 | 05:39 +00:09 | 50:29 -00:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 56:02 | 02:18 -00:13 | 56:08 -00:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 58:07 | 05:38 +00:04 | 58:26 -00:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:32 | 01:03:49 | 05:29 +01:03 | 01:04:04 -00:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:29 | 01:10:21 | 06:21 +00:08 | 01:09:33 +00:48 |
| Wall Balls | 08:12 | 01:16:50 | 07:00 +01:12 | 01:15:54 +00:56 |
| Roxzone | 05:27 | 01:30:21 | 07:27 -02:00 | 01:30:21 |
Wim Mackaaij demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank in the top 42% of 3118 athletes and ranking 19th in his age group of 55-59. His total running time of 44:56 was notably 5 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. This suggests that Wim has a more runner-oriented profile, excelling in speed and endurance on the track. However, his initial pacing strategy appeared to be slightly aggressive, as his first running segment was significantly faster than average, possibly contributing to slower times in subsequent segments. Despite this, his overall transitions in the Roxzone were impressive, being 1:54 faster than average, showcasing efficient transitions and a strong grasp of race management.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wieser Sebastian | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:29:51 | |
| Bidwell Oliver | 2024 London | 01:30:18 | |
| Nagl Bernhard | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:29:54 | |
| Sadler Kevin | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:38 | |
| Hissong Adam | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:30:23 | |
| Harding Ross | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:52 | |
| Gilhespy Jonathan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:12 | |
| Hayes Chris | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:10 | |
| Andrews Jack A | 2023 London | 01:30:31 | |
| Bañales Jaurrieta Iñigo | 2022 Valencia | 01:30:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
