Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 709 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mannot Elmar's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mannot Elmar's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mannot Elmar's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mannot Elmar's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 17:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 17:00 | 01:09:03 to 52:03 | 99.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:53 to 04:51 | 0.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:33 to 02:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:31 to 05:31 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:47 to 05:47 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:57 to 04:57 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:28 to 05:28 | 0.0% |
| Mannot Elmar | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:27 | 00:00 | 05:25 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 04:27 | 04:48 +00:05 | 05:25 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 08:41 | 09:20 | 06:01 +02:40 | 10:13 -00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:33 | 18:01 | 03:41 -01:08 | 16:14 +01:47 |
| Running 3 | 09:02 | 20:34 | 06:44 +02:18 | 19:55 +00:39 |
| Sled Pull | 05:31 | 29:36 | 06:34 -01:03 | 26:39 +02:57 |
| Running 4 | 09:07 | 35:07 | 06:43 +02:24 | 33:13 +01:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:47 | 44:14 | 07:41 -01:54 | 39:56 +04:18 |
| Running 5 | 09:31 | 50:01 | 07:04 +02:27 | 47:37 +02:24 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 59:32 | 05:22 -00:25 | 54:41 +04:51 |
| Running 6 | 09:12 | 01:04:29 | 06:52 +02:20 | 01:00:03 +04:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 01:13:41 | 02:44 -00:31 | 01:06:55 +06:46 |
| Running 7 | 09:14 | 01:15:54 | 06:51 +02:23 | 01:09:39 +06:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:34 | 01:25:08 | 07:00 -02:26 | 01:16:30 +08:38 |
| Running 8 | 09:51 | 01:29:42 | 08:23 +01:28 | 01:23:30 +06:12 |
| Wall Balls | 05:28 | 01:39:33 | 09:12 -03:44 | 01:31:53 +07:40 |
| Roxzone | 06:26 | 01:51:20 | 10:15 -03:49 | 01:51:20 |
Elmar's total running time of 01:09:03 is 16:15 slower than the average, indicating that his running could be a point of improvement. However, it is important to note that his best running lap of 00:04:27 was 00:46 faster than the average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in running.
Overall, Elmar Mannot has shown potential in running, but there is room for improvement in certain segments. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, he can enhance his overall performance in the Hyrox race. Incorporating interval training, strength training, and improving transition times will help him become a stronger and more efficient athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wolf Alexander | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:50:56 | |
| Gallardo Garcia Miguel Angel | 2021 Madrid | 01:51:14 | |
| Saminadin Ganesh | 2023 Barcelona | 01:51:34 | |
| Schwekendiek Silas | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:51:46 | |
| Mclaughlin James | 2024 Glasgow | 01:51:03 | |
| Jakubiuk Konrad | 2018 Essen | 01:51:09 | |
| Van Mark Henrik | 2023 Hamburg | 01:50:50 | |
| Lin Jay | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:51:01 | |
| Loong Tse Han | 2023 Singapore | 01:50:54 | |
| Tan Jee Cheng Johnny | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:51:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
