Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Moloney Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Moloney Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Moloney Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Moloney Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:24 | 49:43 to 41:19 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:49 to 03:49 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:29 to 03:29 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:35 to 01:35 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Moloney Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:12 | 00:00 | 04:34 -00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:49 | 04:12 | 04:25 -00:36 | 04:34 -00:22 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 08:01 | 04:54 +00:27 | 08:59 -00:58 |
| Sled Push | 02:07 | 13:22 | 02:52 -00:45 | 13:53 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 09:57 | 15:29 | 05:21 +04:36 | 16:45 -01:16 |
| Sled Pull | 03:29 | 25:26 | 04:51 -01:22 | 22:06 +03:20 |
| Running 4 | 06:05 | 28:55 | 05:19 +00:46 | 26:57 +01:58 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:52 | 35:00 | 05:13 -01:21 | 32:16 +02:44 |
| Running 5 | 06:17 | 38:52 | 05:29 +00:48 | 37:29 +01:23 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 45:09 | 04:47 -00:18 | 42:58 +02:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:32 | 49:38 | 05:21 +00:11 | 47:45 +01:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:35 | 55:10 | 02:08 -00:33 | 53:06 +02:04 |
| Running 7 | 06:03 | 56:45 | 05:19 +00:44 | 55:14 +01:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:04 | 01:02:48 | 05:00 -00:56 | 01:00:33 +02:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:06:52 | 05:55 +00:25 | 01:05:33 +01:19 |
| Wall Balls | 04:43 | 01:13:12 | 06:22 -01:39 | 01:11:28 +01:44 |
| Roxzone | 06:46 | 01:24:32 | 06:42 +00:04 | 01:24:32 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Andrew excelled in certain segments such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls. He was consistently faster than the average in these segments, indicating his strength and proficiency in these exercises.
However, there were several running segments where Andrew fell behind the average time, particularly in Running 3, Running 5, Running 4, and Running 7. This suggests that he may need to focus more on his running training to improve his overall running performance.
In conclusion, Andrew Moloney had a commendable performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can make improvements. By focusing on his running training, improving his transition times, and continuing to build strength in his strongest segments, he can enhance his overall performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Riedlinger Thorben | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:24:32 | |
| Schobermayr Anton | 2019 Wien | 01:24:50 | |
| Van Leeuwen David | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:38 | |
| Cartledge Sean | 2023 Dublin | 01:24:57 | |
| Carralero Pérez Eduardo | 2021 Madrid | 01:24:39 | |
| Hadley Paul | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:24:45 | |
| Bouwer Benjamin | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:24:53 | |
| Petrovic Alexander | 2022 München | 01:25:00 | |
| Fearn Gordon | 2022 London | 01:24:07 | |
| Grahame Dan | 2023 London | 01:24:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
