Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Leipzig using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Helbig Steven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Helbig Steven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Helbig Steven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Helbig Steven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:25 | 47:08 to 43:43 | 49.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:18 | 08:31 to 05:13 | 48.1% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:57 to 04:51 | 1.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:03 | 06:39 to 06:36 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:01 to 01:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:10 to 03:10 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:39 to 01:39 | 0.0% |
| Helbig Steven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:36 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 04:36 | 04:31 -00:06 | 04:46 -00:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 09:01 | 05:08 +00:05 | 09:17 -00:16 |
| Sled Push | 01:01 | 14:14 | 03:04 -02:03 | 14:25 -00:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:50 | 15:15 | 05:37 +00:13 | 17:29 -02:14 |
| Sled Pull | 03:10 | 21:05 | 05:14 -02:04 | 23:06 -02:01 |
| Running 4 | 06:01 | 24:15 | 05:36 +00:25 | 28:20 -04:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:18 | 30:16 | 05:45 -00:27 | 33:56 -03:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:51 | 35:34 | 05:47 +00:04 | 39:41 -04:07 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 41:25 | 04:54 +00:03 | 45:28 -04:03 |
| Running 6 | 05:28 | 46:22 | 05:37 -00:09 | 50:22 -04:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:39 | 51:50 | 02:17 -00:38 | 55:59 -04:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 53:29 | 05:36 -00:14 | 58:16 -04:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:31 | 58:51 | 05:28 +03:03 | 01:03:52 -05:01 |
| Running 8 | 08:49 | 01:07:22 | 06:18 +02:31 | 01:09:20 -01:58 |
| Wall Balls | 06:39 | 01:16:11 | 06:57 -00:18 | 01:15:38 +00:33 |
| Roxzone | 07:20 | 01:30:01 | 07:26 -00:06 | 01:30:01 |
Steven's total running time of 00:47:08 was 04:06 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:04:36 suggests that he has good speed and endurance, but there is room for improvement in pacing and consistency.
In conclusion, Steven Helbig performed well in the HYROX race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and form corrections, Steven can improve his performance in the identified segments. Implementing race strategies, such as maintaining a steady pace and minimizing transition time, will also contribute to better performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rice Sam | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:31 | |
| Frohlich Lukas | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:29:35 | |
| Vinson Michael | 2020 Dallas | 01:30:30 | |
| Dufay Bastien | 2024 Paris | 01:30:26 | |
| Jackson Stuart | 2023 Birmingham | 01:30:16 | |
| Hoban Mark | 2023 Birmingham | 01:29:47 | |
| Gardner Jimmy | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:23 | |
| Emmel Joey | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:30:26 | |
| Garn Tom | 2022 Berlin | 01:29:35 | |
| Kaschub Jonas | 2023 Hamburg | 01:30:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Berlin | 01:27:21 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
