Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 782 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jeffrey Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jeffrey Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jeffrey Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jeffrey Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:02 | 12:50 to 08:48 | 59.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:01 | 07:43 to 06:42 | 15.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:45 | 08:02 to 07:17 | 11.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:43 | 07:06 to 06:23 | 10.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 05:02 to 04:49 | 3.2% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:19 to 05:17 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:05 to 03:05 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:34 to 47:34 | 0.0% |
| Jeffrey Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:36 | 00:00 | 05:21 +01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:02 | 06:36 | 04:46 +00:16 | 05:21 +01:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 11:38 | 05:59 -00:43 | 10:07 +01:31 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 16:54 | 03:42 -00:37 | 16:06 +00:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 19:59 | 06:37 -01:12 | 19:48 +00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 07:06 | 25:24 | 06:29 +00:37 | 26:25 -01:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:44 | 32:30 | 06:37 -00:53 | 32:54 -00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:02 | 38:14 | 07:23 +00:39 | 39:31 -01:17 |
| Running 5 | 05:51 | 46:16 | 06:57 -01:06 | 46:54 -00:38 |
| Rowing | 05:19 | 52:07 | 05:19 +00:00 | 53:51 -01:44 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 57:26 | 06:43 -00:54 | 59:10 -01:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 01:03:15 | 02:42 -00:14 | 01:05:53 -02:38 |
| Running 7 | 05:47 | 01:05:43 | 06:43 -00:56 | 01:08:35 -02:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:43 | 01:11:30 | 06:59 +00:44 | 01:15:18 -03:48 |
| Running 8 | 07:10 | 01:19:13 | 08:10 -01:00 | 01:22:17 -03:04 |
| Wall Balls | 12:50 | 01:26:23 | 08:59 +03:51 | 01:30:27 -04:04 |
| Roxzone | 10:12 | 01:49:16 | 09:50 +00:22 | 01:49:16 |
Despite an overall finish in the top 63% of all athletes and the top 64% of his age group, Paul Jeffrey clearly demonstrated his strengths as a runner in the 2024 Madrid HYROX race. His total running time was faster than the average by 5 minutes and 54 seconds, indicating a strong endurance and speed base. However, his performance in strength-focused segments, such as Wall Balls, where he was 4 minutes slower than average, suggests some areas for improvement. It appears that Paul started slower in the first running segment, but significantly improved his pace in the subsequent running segments. This might indicate a need for better pacing strategy at the start of the race.
Paul should consider implementing the following strategies in his next race:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Biclea Catalin | 2023 Dublin | 01:49:23 | |
| Sale Scott | 2022 Chicago | 01:49:42 | |
| Cheng Jimmy HKGHYROX | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:49:29 | |
| O'Leary Cormac | 2024 Rimini | 01:49:21 | |
| Berry Casey | 2024 Milan | 01:48:48 | |
| Schutter Marco | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:48:47 | |
| Kohn Dennis | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:49:41 | |
| Chan Yun San | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:49:32 | |
| Seizovic David | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:49:14 | |
| Gonzalez Carvajal Memo | 2024 Mexico City | 01:49:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:48:34 | |
| 2022 London | 01:44:41 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:42:51 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:43:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
