Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 144 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Welsh David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Welsh David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Welsh David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Welsh David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 15:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:50 | 01:07:11 to 57:21 | 64.0% |
| Wall Balls | 02:48 | 13:23 to 10:35 | 18.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:15 | 10:53 to 08:38 | 14.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 04:54 to 04:25 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:23 to 06:23 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:53 to 06:53 | 0.0% |
| Welsh David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:35 | 00:00 | 05:56 +00:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 06:35 | 05:01 -00:14 | 05:56 +00:39 |
| Running 2 | 06:55 | 11:22 | 06:49 +00:06 | 10:57 +00:25 |
| Sled Push | 04:54 | 18:17 | 04:17 +00:37 | 17:46 +00:31 |
| Running 3 | 08:24 | 23:11 | 07:58 +00:26 | 22:03 +01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 06:23 | 31:35 | 07:47 -01:24 | 30:01 +01:34 |
| Running 4 | 08:55 | 37:58 | 08:01 +00:54 | 37:48 +00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:53 | 46:53 | 09:08 +01:45 | 45:49 +01:04 |
| Running 5 | 08:37 | 57:46 | 08:29 +00:08 | 54:57 +02:49 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 01:06:23 | 05:53 -00:43 | 01:03:26 +02:57 |
| Running 6 | 08:55 | 01:11:33 | 08:06 +00:49 | 01:09:19 +02:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:31 | 01:20:28 | 03:07 -00:36 | 01:17:25 +03:03 |
| Running 7 | 08:33 | 01:22:59 | 08:06 +00:27 | 01:20:32 +02:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:53 | 01:31:32 | 09:08 -02:15 | 01:28:38 +02:54 |
| Running 8 | 10:19 | 01:38:25 | 11:09 -00:50 | 01:37:46 +00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 13:23 | 01:48:44 | 11:40 +01:43 | 01:48:55 -00:11 |
| Roxzone | 10:20 | 02:12:20 | 11:45 -01:25 | 02:12:20 |
David's overall time of 02:12:20 is a good starting point for analysis. His total running time of 01:07:11 was 09:41 slower than the average, indicating that he could improve his running performance. To address this, David should focus on specific training strategies to enhance his running endurance and speed.
In summary, David Welsh had a commendable performance in the 2022 Hyrox race in London. To improve his performance, he should focus on specific areas of improvement such as running, upper body and core strength, and transition efficiency. By implementing the training strategies and techniques outlined above, David can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Funke Tom | 2022 Leipzig | 02:12:47 | |
| Ygouf Alexandre | 2024 Paris | 02:11:57 | |
| Chapman David | 2021 Dallas | 02:12:44 | |
| Roye Brian | 2024 New York | 02:12:12 | |
| Malik Amir | 2024 Manchester | 02:11:52 | |
| Runte Ingo | 2023 Hannover | 02:12:31 | |
| Nzsdejan Szevak | 2024 Poznan | 02:11:59 | |
| Grandhi Sai Kumar | 2024 Birmingham | 02:12:22 | |
| Lindsay William | 2024 Glasgow | 02:11:55 | |
| Lai Siu In | 2024 Hong Kong | 02:12:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Valencia | 02:10:43 | |
| 2023 London | 02:13:27 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
